18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Toyo
Proxes CF2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
2
1
24
14
Best position
#8
#1
#1
#1
Average position
17.5
1.0
2.7
3.6
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
74
64
302
188

Wet

Wet
Toyo Proxes CF2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Wet braking
Toyo Proxes CF2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Wet circle cornering
Toyo Proxes CF2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Toyo Proxes CF2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Wet handling
Toyo Proxes CF2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Toyo Proxes CF2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%

Comfort

Comfort
Toyo Proxes CF2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Interior noise
Toyo Proxes CF2
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Exterior noise
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%

Dry

Dry
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%

Costs

Costs
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Mileage
Toyo Proxes CF2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison