18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Test Profile

Toyo
Proxes CF2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Number of tests
2
3
3
23
Best position
#8
#2
#2
#1
Average position
17.5
3.3
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
74
40
34
188

Wet

Wet
Toyo Proxes CF2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Wet braking
Toyo Proxes CF2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Wet circle cornering
Toyo Proxes CF2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Toyo Proxes CF2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Wet handling
Toyo Proxes CF2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Toyo Proxes CF2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Toyo Proxes CF2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Interior noise
Toyo Proxes CF2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Exterior noise
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%

Dry

Dry
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%

Costs

Costs
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Mileage
Toyo Proxes CF2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison