Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Upper-middle

Toyo

Proxes CF2

R14 – R18

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Proxes CF2

e.Ziex

Quadraxer 3

CrossClimate 2

Number of tests

2

3

13

24

Best position

#8

#2

#4

#1

Average position

17.5

3.7

6.3

2.7

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

74

34

111

151

Wet

Toyo Proxes CF2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

72%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

Wet handling

Toyo Proxes CF2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

64%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Toyo Proxes CF2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

81%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

Wet braking

Toyo Proxes CF2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Wet circle cornering

Toyo Proxes CF2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

70%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Toyo Proxes CF2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Comfort

Toyo Proxes CF2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

66%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

Exterior noise

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

79%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

Dry

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Costs

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

Mileage

Toyo Proxes CF2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

64%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Proxes CF2

e.Ziex

Quadraxer 3

CrossClimate 2

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison