18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Test Profile

Toyo
Proxes CF2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Number of tests
2
2
3
11
Best position
#8
#1
#2
#1
Average position
17.5
1.0
3.3
11.6
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
2024
Available sizes
74
23
40
121

Wet

Wet
Toyo Proxes CF2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Wet braking
Toyo Proxes CF2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Wet circle cornering
Toyo Proxes CF2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Aquaplaning - cross
Toyo Proxes CF2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Wet handling
Toyo Proxes CF2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Toyo Proxes CF2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%

Comfort

Comfort
Toyo Proxes CF2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Exterior noise
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%

Dry

Dry
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%

Costs

Costs
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Mileage
Toyo Proxes CF2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison