18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Toyo
Proxes CF2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
2
49
24
Best position
#8
#1
#1
Average position
17.5
3.2
2.7
Latest test
2019
2024
2025
Available sizes
74
213
302

Wet

Wet
Toyo Proxes CF2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Wet handling
Toyo Proxes CF2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Toyo Proxes CF2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Wet braking
Toyo Proxes CF2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Wet circle cornering
Toyo Proxes CF2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Toyo Proxes CF2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%

Comfort

Comfort
Toyo Proxes CF2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Exterior noise
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Interior noise
Toyo Proxes CF2
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Dry

Dry
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Dry driving behavior
Toyo Proxes CF2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%

Costs

Costs
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Mileage
Toyo Proxes CF2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison