18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Test Profile

Toyo
Proxes CF2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Number of tests
2
49
23
Best position
#8
#1
#1
Average position
17.5
3.2
6.7
Latest test
2019
2024
2025
Available sizes
74
213
107

Wet

Wet
Toyo Proxes CF2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Wet circle cornering
Toyo Proxes CF2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Aquaplaning - cross
Toyo Proxes CF2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Wet handling
Toyo Proxes CF2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Toyo Proxes CF2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Wet braking
Toyo Proxes CF2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%

Comfort

Comfort
Toyo Proxes CF2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Exterior noise
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Interior noise
Toyo Proxes CF2
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Costs

Costs
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Fuel efficiency
Toyo Proxes CF2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Mileage
Toyo Proxes CF2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%

Dry

Dry
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Dry driving behavior
Toyo Proxes CF2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison