18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Toyo Proxes CF2

Toyo

Proxes CF2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Also compare with

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Toyo (68%). The first tyre test of Toyo Proxes CF2 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested.

Test Profile

Toyo

Proxes CF2

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Number of tests

2

49

Best position

#8

#1

Average position

17.5

3.2

Latest test

2019

2024

Available sizes

74

213

Wet

Wet

Toyo Proxes CF2

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Toyo Proxes CF2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Wet braking

Toyo Proxes CF2

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Wet circle cornering

Toyo Proxes CF2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

Toyo Proxes CF2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Wet handling

Toyo Proxes CF2

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Comfort

Comfort

Toyo Proxes CF2

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Exterior noise

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Interior noise

Toyo Proxes CF2

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

Dry

Dry

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Dry driving behavior

Toyo Proxes CF2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Costs

Costs

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Fuel efficiency

Toyo Proxes CF2

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Mileage

Toyo Proxes CF2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison