18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Toyo Proxes CF2Upper-middle
ToyoToyo

Proxes CF2

R14 – R18
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0
R15 – R22
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 WinterContact TS 870 UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Toyo
Proxes CF2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Number of tests
2
14
23
Best position
#8
#1
#1
Average position
17.5
3.6
3.3
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
74
188
176

Wet

Wet
Toyo Proxes CF2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Wet braking
Toyo Proxes CF2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Wet circle cornering
Toyo Proxes CF2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
Toyo Proxes CF2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Wet handling
Toyo Proxes CF2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Toyo Proxes CF2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%

Comfort

Comfort
Toyo Proxes CF2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Exterior noise
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Interior noise
Toyo Proxes CF2
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Costs

Costs
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Mileage
Toyo Proxes CF2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%

Dry

Dry
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Dry driving behavior
Toyo Proxes CF2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison