18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Toyo
Proxes CF2
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
2
23
3
24
Best position
#8
#1
#2
#1
Average position
17.5
6.7
3.7
2.7
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
74
107
34
302

Wet

Wet
Toyo Proxes CF2
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Wet circle cornering
Toyo Proxes CF2
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Toyo Proxes CF2
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Wet handling
Toyo Proxes CF2
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Toyo Proxes CF2
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Wet braking
Toyo Proxes CF2
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%

Comfort

Comfort
Toyo Proxes CF2
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Exterior noise
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Interior noise
Toyo Proxes CF2
91%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Costs

Costs
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Mileage
Toyo Proxes CF2
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Dry

Dry
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison