18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Toyo
Proxes CF2
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
2
23
3
14
Best position
#8
#1
#2
#1
Average position
17.5
6.7
3.7
3.6
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
74
107
34
188

Wet

Wet
Toyo Proxes CF2
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Wet circle cornering
Toyo Proxes CF2
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Toyo Proxes CF2
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Wet handling
Toyo Proxes CF2
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Toyo Proxes CF2
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet braking
Toyo Proxes CF2
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Toyo Proxes CF2
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%

Costs

Costs
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Mileage
Toyo Proxes CF2
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%

Dry

Dry
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison