18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Test Profile

Toyo
Proxes CF2
Apollo
Alnac 4G
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Number of tests
2
8
49
Best position
#8
#2
#1
Average position
17.5
18.9
3.2
Latest test
2019
2023
2024
Available sizes
74
77
213

Wet

Wet
Toyo Proxes CF2
76%
Apollo Alnac 4G
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Wet braking
Toyo Proxes CF2
88%
Apollo Alnac 4G
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Wet circle cornering
Toyo Proxes CF2
72%
Apollo Alnac 4G
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Toyo Proxes CF2
67%
Apollo Alnac 4G
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Wet handling
Toyo Proxes CF2
66%
Apollo Alnac 4G
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Toyo Proxes CF2
78%
Apollo Alnac 4G
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%

Comfort

Comfort
Toyo Proxes CF2
84%
Apollo Alnac 4G
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Interior noise
Toyo Proxes CF2
91%
Apollo Alnac 4G
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Exterior noise
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Apollo Alnac 4G
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%

Dry

Dry
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Apollo Alnac 4G
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Dry driving behavior
Toyo Proxes CF2
77%
Apollo Alnac 4G
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%

Costs

Costs
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Apollo Alnac 4G
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Fuel efficiency
Toyo Proxes CF2
82%
Apollo Alnac 4G
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Mileage
Toyo Proxes CF2
70%
Apollo Alnac 4G
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison