Comparison: Toyo Celsius vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Toyo

Celsius

R14 – R20

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Celsius

Ecsta HS52

CrossClimate 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

7

10

24

3

Best position

#7

#2

#1

#2

Average position

12.9

6.0

2.7

3.7

Latest test

2022

2026

2025

Available sizes

75

109

150

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Toyo Celsius

49%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Toyo Celsius

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Toyo Celsius

51%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Toyo Celsius

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet circle cornering

Toyo Celsius

46%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Snow

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow traction

Toyo Celsius

70%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow braking

Toyo Celsius

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

90%

Snow handling

Toyo Celsius

69%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow cornering

Toyo Celsius

55%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

93%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Toyo Celsius

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Toyo Celsius

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Toyo Celsius

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Toyo Celsius

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

83%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Toyo Celsius

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

VS

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Also compare

Toyo Celsius vs Continental AllSeasonContact

Toyo Celsius vs Michelin CrossClimate+

Toyo Celsius vs Nokian WeatherProof

Toyo Celsius vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Browse by brand

Comparison: Toyo Celsius vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Celsius

Ecsta HS52

CrossClimate 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison