18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO vs. Continental AllSeasonContact

Quick summary: The Vredestein Quatrac is the clear test winner in independent comparisons — it scores 93% in our database and consistently places in the top third of Autobild and ADAC line-ups. The Toyo Celsius AS2 scores 54%, offering strong mileage and value but lagging behind in wet and dynamic handling. Neither model has been replaced by a newer model in our records.


Links: Vredestein Quatrac — manufacturer: Vredestein. Toyo Celsius AS2 — manufacturer: Toyo.


Aggregated test picture


  • Autobild (multiple years): Vredestein finished as high as 2nd of 15 and frequently inside the top 5 (5th of 37 in another test). Toyo typically ranks lower (about 12th in comparable Autobild tests).

  • ADAC: Vredestein placed 6th of 16, Toyo 11th of 16.

  • Overall rating: Vredestein 93% vs Toyo 54% — a significant gap that matches the pattern seen across wet, dry and mixed-condition testing.


Vredestein Quatrac — strengths & weaknesses


  • Strengths: Outstanding wet performance (wet handling, wet braking, aquaplaning resistance) and low exterior noise. Tests repeatedly highlight the tyre as a “Nässespezialist” with confident behaviour in rain and mixed conditions. Also scores well for dry handling and agility.

  • Weaknesses: Average tread life in several tests and in some reports a slightly higher rolling resistance. Some test notes call out “average wet and snow braking” in specific scenarios, but overall the Quatrac’s wet reserves and handling usually compensate.

  • Verdict: The Quatrac is the better-performing all-round tyre for drivers prioritising safety in wet conditions and dynamic handling. It is the superior choice in head-to-heads against the Toyo on braking and aquaplaning tests.


Toyo Celsius AS2 — strengths & weaknesses


  • Strengths: Excellent value and long mileage — repeated test summaries praise its high kilometre performance and competitive price/value ratio. Comfortable ride and low exterior noise are other pluses. Good aquaplaning reserves are noted in several reviews, making it a dependable budget option.

  • Weaknesses: Weaker winter and wet dynamic performance compared with the Quatrac: longer wet braking distances, understeer on wet and snowy surfaces, delayed steering response. These deficits show up in lower positions in Autobild and ADAC tests.

  • Verdict: The Celsius AS2 is a sensible, cost-conscious choice for mileage-focused drivers who accept compromises in handling precision and wet braking. It is not the top performer in mixed-weather performance tests.


Head-to-head conclusion
Across the comprehensive set of tests (Autobild 2022–2025, ADAC and comparative reviews), the Vredestein Quatrac outperforms the Toyo Celsius AS2 in almost all dynamic and wet-condition metrics, and places consistently higher in overall rankings. The Toyo compensates with better wear and price/value, so choose the Quatrac if wet-weather safety and handling are priorities, or the Celsius AS2 if cost-per-kilometre and comfort dominate your buying decision.

Test Profile

Toyo
Celsius AS2
Vredestein
Quatrac
Kleber
Quadraxer 3
Laufenn
G Fit 4S
Bridgestone
Weather Control A005 EVO
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Number of tests
14
16
13
5
11
26
Best position
#7
#1
#4
#10
#1
#1
Average position
11.6
3.1
6.3
14.8
5.9
4.2
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
2025
2022
2024
Available sizes
109
86
111
4
90
100

Wet

Wet
Toyo Celsius AS2
57%
Vredestein Quatrac
87%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
81%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
76%
Continental AllSeasonContact
80%
Wet braking
Toyo Celsius AS2
55%
Vredestein Quatrac
86%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
84%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
87%
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
Wet handling
Toyo Celsius AS2
59%
Vredestein Quatrac
92%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
88%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
72%
Continental AllSeasonContact
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Toyo Celsius AS2
75%
Vredestein Quatrac
84%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
69%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
73%
Continental AllSeasonContact
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Toyo Celsius AS2
82%
Vredestein Quatrac
82%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
77%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
71%
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
Wet circle cornering
Toyo Celsius AS2
63%
Vredestein Quatrac
88%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
92%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
87%
Continental AllSeasonContact
86%

Snow

Snow
Toyo Celsius AS2
61%
Vredestein Quatrac
81%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
82%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
70%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
60%
Continental AllSeasonContact
88%
Snow traction
Toyo Celsius AS2
52%
Vredestein Quatrac
79%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
85%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
75%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
64%
Continental AllSeasonContact
84%
Snow handling
Toyo Celsius AS2
59%
Vredestein Quatrac
83%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
57%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
63%
Continental AllSeasonContact
87%
Snow braking
Toyo Celsius AS2
69%
Vredestein Quatrac
84%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
84%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
72%
Continental AllSeasonContact
86%
Snow cornering
Toyo Celsius AS2
65%
Vredestein Quatrac
74%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
87%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
61%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
61%
Continental AllSeasonContact
93%

Dry

Dry
Toyo Celsius AS2
69%
Vredestein Quatrac
82%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
77%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
72%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
78%
Continental AllSeasonContact
76%
Dry braking
Toyo Celsius AS2
74%
Vredestein Quatrac
79%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
82%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
56%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
82%
Continental AllSeasonContact
68%
Dry handling
Toyo Celsius AS2
68%
Vredestein Quatrac
81%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
88%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
91%
Continental AllSeasonContact
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Toyo Celsius AS2
57%
Vredestein Quatrac
88%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
51%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
74%
Continental AllSeasonContact
73%
Exterior noise
Toyo Celsius AS2
76%
Vredestein Quatrac
86%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
51%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
75%
Continental AllSeasonContact
79%
Comfort
Toyo Celsius AS2
82%
Vredestein Quatrac
78%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
69%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
77%
Continental AllSeasonContact
76%
Interior noise
Toyo Celsius AS2
33%
Vredestein Quatrac
95%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
73%
Continental AllSeasonContact
78%

Costs

Costs
Toyo Celsius AS2
77%
Vredestein Quatrac
67%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
66%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
68%
Continental AllSeasonContact
82%
Rolling resistance
Toyo Celsius AS2
68%
Vredestein Quatrac
77%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
59%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
78%
Continental AllSeasonContact
87%
Price/value
Toyo Celsius AS2
91%
Vredestein Quatrac
64%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
92%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
54%
Continental AllSeasonContact
63%
Mileage
Toyo Celsius AS2
84%
Vredestein Quatrac
56%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
67%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
55%
Continental AllSeasonContact
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
All season
2022195/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison