Comparison: Semperit Speed-Life 3 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Budget

Semperit

Speed-Life 3

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Speed-Life 3

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

14

4

2

3

Best position

#2

#3

#1

#2

Average position

18.1

12.0

1.0

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

116

111

23

34

40

Wet

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Semperit Speed-Life 3

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Wet braking

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Wet handling

Semperit Speed-Life 3

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Wet circle cornering

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Wet side guide

Semperit Speed-Life 3

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Dry

Semperit Speed-Life 3

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry braking

Semperit Speed-Life 3

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dry handling

Semperit Speed-Life 3

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Comfort

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Exterior noise

Semperit Speed-Life 3

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Interior noise

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Comfort

Semperit Speed-Life 3

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Costs

Semperit Speed-Life 3

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Mileage

Semperit Speed-Life 3

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Rolling resistance

Semperit Speed-Life 3

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Semperit Speed-Life 3 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Speed-Life 3

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison