18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Semperit Speed-Life 3 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

In this review, we compare two summer tyres; the Semperit Speed-Life 3 and the Kumho Ecsta HS52. Both tyres are a popular choice among consumers and have been praised for their performance in various tests.


The Semperit Speed-Life 3 comes from a line of highly rated tyres. It replaces the Semperit Speed-Life and enhances several key features. However, it scored lower in our ratings at 47%. Despite its impressive features such as handling on wet surfaces, high projected lifespan, low wear, and good efficiency, it didn’t perform as well on dry surfaces. For instance, in the Autobild test, it ranked 43rd out of 51 tyres. In the ADAC test, it took the 19th position among 50 tyres. A 10th position out of 19 was achieved in the Autoklub test. The tyre's strengths lie in good handling on wet surfaces, high projected wear and good efficiency. Although, its major drawback is in dry driving conditions where the tyre didn’t deliver as expected. Visit this link to view more about Semperit Speed-Life 3's manufacturer.


On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS52, which replaced the Kumho Ecsta HS51, has a better performance with a rating of 73%. This tyre stands out in braking, handling, and value for money in dry conditions. It also accomplishes remarkable wet braking and wet circle cornering. However, the tyre slightly lacks in comfort and efficiency. The Ecsta HS52 placed third in the Autobild test, amongst 51 tyres tested. In the ADAC test it ranked 8th out of 50 and in the Autoklub it placed 13th out of 19. The tyre's major strengths are in good dry and wet performance, great braking distances, and good value for money. On the downside, the tyre is slightly lacking in comfort and has a reduced efficiency rate. Visit this link to view more about Kumho Ecsta HS52's manufacturer.


Overall, in comparing the Semperit Speed-Life 3 to the Kumho Ecsta HS52, the latter seems to perform better in terms of overall testing and consumer rating. However, both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses and the final decision should be based on individual driver’s needs and preferences.

Test Profile

Semperit
Speed-Life 3
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
14
10
21
3
3
Best position
#2
#2
#2
#2
#2
Average position
18.1
6.0
11.9
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2024
2026
2025
Available sizes
116
104
164
40
34

Wet

Wet
Semperit Speed-Life 3
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Semperit Speed-Life 3
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Semperit Speed-Life 3
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Semperit Speed-Life 3
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Semperit Speed-Life 3
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Semperit Speed-Life 3
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet performance
Semperit Speed-Life 3
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Wet side guide
Semperit Speed-Life 3
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Semperit Speed-Life 3
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Semperit Speed-Life 3
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Semperit Speed-Life 3
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Comfort
Semperit Speed-Life 3
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Dry

Dry
Semperit Speed-Life 3
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Semperit Speed-Life 3
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry driving behavior
Semperit Speed-Life 3
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry handling
Semperit Speed-Life 3
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry performance
Semperit Speed-Life 3
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%

Costs

Costs
Semperit Speed-Life 3
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Semperit Speed-Life 3
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Fuel efficiency
Semperit Speed-Life 3
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Price/value
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison