18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Semperit Speed-Life 3 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Primacy 5

In this review, we compare two summer tyres; the Semperit Speed-Life 3 and the Kumho Ecsta HS52. Both tyres are a popular choice among consumers and have been praised for their performance in various tests.


The Semperit Speed-Life 3 comes from a line of highly rated tyres. It replaces the Semperit Speed-Life and enhances several key features. However, it scored lower in our ratings at 47%. Despite its impressive features such as handling on wet surfaces, high projected lifespan, low wear, and good efficiency, it didn’t perform as well on dry surfaces. For instance, in the Autobild test, it ranked 43rd out of 51 tyres. In the ADAC test, it took the 19th position among 50 tyres. A 10th position out of 19 was achieved in the Autoklub test. The tyre's strengths lie in good handling on wet surfaces, high projected wear and good efficiency. Although, its major drawback is in dry driving conditions where the tyre didn’t deliver as expected. Visit this link to view more about Semperit Speed-Life 3's manufacturer.


On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS52, which replaced the Kumho Ecsta HS51, has a better performance with a rating of 73%. This tyre stands out in braking, handling, and value for money in dry conditions. It also accomplishes remarkable wet braking and wet circle cornering. However, the tyre slightly lacks in comfort and efficiency. The Ecsta HS52 placed third in the Autobild test, amongst 51 tyres tested. In the ADAC test it ranked 8th out of 50 and in the Autoklub it placed 13th out of 19. The tyre's major strengths are in good dry and wet performance, great braking distances, and good value for money. On the downside, the tyre is slightly lacking in comfort and has a reduced efficiency rate. Visit this link to view more about Kumho Ecsta HS52's manufacturer.


Overall, in comparing the Semperit Speed-Life 3 to the Kumho Ecsta HS52, the latter seems to perform better in terms of overall testing and consumer rating. However, both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses and the final decision should be based on individual driver’s needs and preferences.

Test Profile

Semperit
Speed-Life 3
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 5
Number of tests
14
10
3
3
Best position
#2
#2
#2
#1
Average position
18.1
6.0
3.7
4.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
116
104
34
126

Wet

Wet
Semperit Speed-Life 3
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Aquaplaning - cross
Semperit Speed-Life 3
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Semperit Speed-Life 3
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Semperit Speed-Life 3
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Wet handling
Semperit Speed-Life 3
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Semperit Speed-Life 3
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Semperit Speed-Life 3
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Exterior noise
Semperit Speed-Life 3
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Semperit Speed-Life 3
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Comfort
Semperit Speed-Life 3
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Semperit Speed-Life 3
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Dry braking
Semperit Speed-Life 3
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
Dry handling
Semperit Speed-Life 3
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%

Costs

Costs
Semperit Speed-Life 3
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Mileage
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Semperit Speed-Life 3
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison