18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Semperit Speed-Life 3 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Let's take a look at two popular tyre choices: the Semperit Speed-Life 3 and the Firestone Roadhawk. Both of these summer tyres have been well-received in tests, but they each have their own strengths and weaknesses.


The Semperit Speed-Life 3, a model carried forward from previous models such as the Semperit Speed-Life, performed admirably in tests. The tyre's manufacturer ensured this model excelled in wet conditions with an outstanding performance in wet braking and other features. According to AutoBild and ADAC tests, the Semperit Speed-Life 3 achieved a balanced performance. However, the tyre showed some weaknesses on dry surfaces.


Strengths of Semperit Speed-Life 3



  • Excellent performance on wet surfaces

  • Efficiency and good mileage


Weaknesses of Semperit Speed-Life 3



  • Not entirely balanced

  • Weaknesses on dry surfaces


On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk scored well in dry handling, according to the Autobild test. However, the tyre's manufacturer, Firestone, found the tyre shows some weaknesses on wet surfaces. Despite this downside, the Firestone Roadhawk made up for it with its efficiency and durability.


Strengths of Firestone Roadhawk



  • Good performance on dry surfaces

  • Efficient and durable


Weaknesses of Firestone Roadhawk



  • Less balanced

  • Weaknesses on wet surfaces

  • Higher noise level


In terms of mutual test positions, both tyres performed quite similarly in various tests. The Firestone Roadhawk came 10th in the Autobild test, while the Semperit Speed-Life 3 ranked slightly lower at the 12th position. The positions were reversed in the Autoklub CR test, showing these tyres perform comparably in different conditions.


Overall, the Firestone Roadhawk seems to have a better rating at 72% compared to the Semperit Speed-Life 3 at 65%. However, considering individual strengths and weaknesses, the decision falls upon individual needs and preferences. While the Firestone Roadhawk excels in dry conditions, the Semperit Speed-Life 3 is a more reliable choice for wet conditions.

Test Profile

Semperit
Speed-Life 3
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
14
21
4
3
3
3
Best position
#2
#2
#3
#2
#2
#2
Average position
18.1
11.9
12.0
3.3
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
116
164
111
40
34
60

Wet

Wet
Semperit Speed-Life 3
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Semperit Speed-Life 3
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet braking
Semperit Speed-Life 3
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Semperit Speed-Life 3
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet handling
Semperit Speed-Life 3
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Semperit Speed-Life 3
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet side guide
Semperit Speed-Life 3
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Semperit Speed-Life 3
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
Semperit Speed-Life 3
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry driving behavior
Semperit Speed-Life 3
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry handling
Semperit Speed-Life 3
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Semperit Speed-Life 3
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Semperit Speed-Life 3
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Interior noise
Semperit Speed-Life 3
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Comfort
Semperit Speed-Life 3
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Costs

Costs
Semperit Speed-Life 3
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Mileage
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Fuel efficiency
Semperit Speed-Life 3
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Rolling resistance
Semperit Speed-Life 3
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Price/value
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison