18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Semperit Speed-Life 3 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Let's take a look at two popular tyre choices: the Semperit Speed-Life 3 and the Firestone Roadhawk. Both of these summer tyres have been well-received in tests, but they each have their own strengths and weaknesses.


The Semperit Speed-Life 3, a model carried forward from previous models such as the Semperit Speed-Life, performed admirably in tests. The tyre's manufacturer ensured this model excelled in wet conditions with an outstanding performance in wet braking and other features. According to AutoBild and ADAC tests, the Semperit Speed-Life 3 achieved a balanced performance. However, the tyre showed some weaknesses on dry surfaces.


Strengths of Semperit Speed-Life 3



  • Excellent performance on wet surfaces

  • Efficiency and good mileage


Weaknesses of Semperit Speed-Life 3



  • Not entirely balanced

  • Weaknesses on dry surfaces


On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk scored well in dry handling, according to the Autobild test. However, the tyre's manufacturer, Firestone, found the tyre shows some weaknesses on wet surfaces. Despite this downside, the Firestone Roadhawk made up for it with its efficiency and durability.


Strengths of Firestone Roadhawk



  • Good performance on dry surfaces

  • Efficient and durable


Weaknesses of Firestone Roadhawk



  • Less balanced

  • Weaknesses on wet surfaces

  • Higher noise level


In terms of mutual test positions, both tyres performed quite similarly in various tests. The Firestone Roadhawk came 10th in the Autobild test, while the Semperit Speed-Life 3 ranked slightly lower at the 12th position. The positions were reversed in the Autoklub CR test, showing these tyres perform comparably in different conditions.


Overall, the Firestone Roadhawk seems to have a better rating at 72% compared to the Semperit Speed-Life 3 at 65%. However, considering individual strengths and weaknesses, the decision falls upon individual needs and preferences. While the Firestone Roadhawk excels in dry conditions, the Semperit Speed-Life 3 is a more reliable choice for wet conditions.

Test Profile

Semperit
Speed-Life 3
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
14
21
10
18
3
Best position
#2
#2
#2
#1
#2
Average position
18.1
11.9
6.0
6.1
3.3
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
2024
2026
Available sizes
116
164
104
47
40

Wet

Wet
Semperit Speed-Life 3
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Semperit Speed-Life 3
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Wet braking
Semperit Speed-Life 3
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Semperit Speed-Life 3
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet handling
Semperit Speed-Life 3
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Wet circle cornering
Semperit Speed-Life 3
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet performance
Semperit Speed-Life 3
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Wet side guide
Semperit Speed-Life 3
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Dry

Dry
Semperit Speed-Life 3
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Semperit Speed-Life 3
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry driving behavior
Semperit Speed-Life 3
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry handling
Semperit Speed-Life 3
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry performance
Semperit Speed-Life 3
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%

Comfort

Comfort
Semperit Speed-Life 3
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Semperit Speed-Life 3
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Interior noise
Semperit Speed-Life 3
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Comfort
Semperit Speed-Life 3
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Costs

Costs
Semperit Speed-Life 3
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Fuel efficiency
Semperit Speed-Life 3
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Rolling resistance
Semperit Speed-Life 3
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Price/value
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison