18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Semperit Speed-Life 3 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy

Let's take a look at two popular tyre choices: the Semperit Speed-Life 3 and the Firestone Roadhawk. Both of these summer tyres have been well-received in tests, but they each have their own strengths and weaknesses.


The Semperit Speed-Life 3, a model carried forward from previous models such as the Semperit Speed-Life, performed admirably in tests. The tyre's manufacturer ensured this model excelled in wet conditions with an outstanding performance in wet braking and other features. According to AutoBild and ADAC tests, the Semperit Speed-Life 3 achieved a balanced performance. However, the tyre showed some weaknesses on dry surfaces.


Strengths of Semperit Speed-Life 3



  • Excellent performance on wet surfaces

  • Efficiency and good mileage


Weaknesses of Semperit Speed-Life 3



  • Not entirely balanced

  • Weaknesses on dry surfaces


On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk scored well in dry handling, according to the Autobild test. However, the tyre's manufacturer, Firestone, found the tyre shows some weaknesses on wet surfaces. Despite this downside, the Firestone Roadhawk made up for it with its efficiency and durability.


Strengths of Firestone Roadhawk



  • Good performance on dry surfaces

  • Efficient and durable


Weaknesses of Firestone Roadhawk



  • Less balanced

  • Weaknesses on wet surfaces

  • Higher noise level


In terms of mutual test positions, both tyres performed quite similarly in various tests. The Firestone Roadhawk came 10th in the Autobild test, while the Semperit Speed-Life 3 ranked slightly lower at the 12th position. The positions were reversed in the Autoklub CR test, showing these tyres perform comparably in different conditions.


Overall, the Firestone Roadhawk seems to have a better rating at 72% compared to the Semperit Speed-Life 3 at 65%. However, considering individual strengths and weaknesses, the decision falls upon individual needs and preferences. While the Firestone Roadhawk excels in dry conditions, the Semperit Speed-Life 3 is a more reliable choice for wet conditions.

Test Profile

Semperit
Speed-Life 3
Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Number of tests
14
21
36
18
4
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#1
#3
Average position
18.1
11.9
3.1
6.1
12.0
Latest test
2026
2024
2023
2024
2025
Available sizes
116
164
296
47
111

Wet

Wet
Semperit Speed-Life 3
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Semperit Speed-Life 3
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Wet braking
Semperit Speed-Life 3
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Wet handling
Semperit Speed-Life 3
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Semperit Speed-Life 3
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Wet circle cornering
Semperit Speed-Life 3
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Wet performance
Semperit Speed-Life 3
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Wet side guide
Semperit Speed-Life 3
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Semperit Speed-Life 3
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Exterior noise
Semperit Speed-Life 3
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Interior noise
Semperit Speed-Life 3
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Comfort
Semperit Speed-Life 3
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%

Dry

Dry
Semperit Speed-Life 3
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Dry braking
Semperit Speed-Life 3
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Dry driving behavior
Semperit Speed-Life 3
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Dry handling
Semperit Speed-Life 3
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Dry performance
Semperit Speed-Life 3
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%

Costs

Costs
Semperit Speed-Life 3
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Mileage
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Rolling resistance
Semperit Speed-Life 3
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Fuel efficiency
Semperit Speed-Life 3
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Price/value
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison