Comparison: Semperit Speed-Life 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Semperit

Speed-Life 2

R15 – R20

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Speed-Life 2

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Number of tests

7

10

3

Best position

#3

#2

Average position

13.7

6.0

3.7

Latest test

2020

2026

2025

Available sizes

82

104

34

Wet

Semperit Speed-Life 2

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Semperit Speed-Life 2

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Semperit Speed-Life 2

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Semperit Speed-Life 2

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Semperit Speed-Life 2

40%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Semperit Speed-Life 2

65%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Dry

Semperit Speed-Life 2

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Semperit Speed-Life 2

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Semperit Speed-Life 2

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Semperit Speed-Life 2

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Semperit Speed-Life 2

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Semperit Speed-Life 2

100%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Semperit Speed-Life 2

100%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Semperit Speed-Life 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Speed-Life 2

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison