Comparison: Semperit Speed-Life 2 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP

The comparison between the Semperit Speed‑Life 2 and the Fulda EcoControl HP in independent summer tyre tests shows a clear performance gap in favour of the Semperit. Both tyres are discontinued in their original form and have been succeeded by newer models — the Semperit Speed‑Life 3 replaces the Semperit Speed‑Life 2, and the Fulda EcoControl HP2 replaces the Fulda EcoControl HP. For brand information see the manufacturers: Semperit and Fulda.

What the tests say

• ADAC test: Semperit Speed‑Life 2 finished 6th of 16, while Fulda EcoControl HP finished 10th of 16.


• AutoBild test: Semperit placed 3rd of 50, Fulda placed 7th of 50.

Summarising these results, the Speed‑Life 2 consistently outperformed the EcoControl HP across the two major mutual tests cited. Averaging the positions (roughly 4.5 vs 8.5) indicates the Semperit shows stronger all‑round performance in the test pool used by these magazines.

Strengths — Semperit Speed‑Life 2
Semperit’s Speed‑Life 2 scored noticeably higher in both ADAC and AutoBild, which suggests better overall handling balance. Its higher placements point to advantages in dynamic behaviour that matter most in comparative test scoring — notably shorter braking distances and more confident wet/dry handling. If you prioritise safety margins and sporty, predictable response in a summer tyre, the Speed‑Life 2 performed better in the tests. Note that the Speed‑Life 2 has since been updated: consider the Speed‑Life 3 for the latest generation.

Strengths — Fulda EcoControl HP
The Fulda EcoControl HP sits lower in the comparative rankings but remains a competent summer tyre. The EcoControl line is engineered for low rolling resistance and economical operation, and the HP variant typically targets comfortable ride and fuel efficiency as key selling points. In the tests it still finished in the top half (7th in AutoBild), so it represents a balanced choice for drivers who prioritise economy and comfort over the last percentage points of wet/dry braking performance. Fulda has since refreshed this line — see the EcoControl HP2 for improvements.

Weaknesses
Semperit: older model status — the original Speed‑Life 2 has been superseded, so buying new stock is less common; the newer Speed‑Life 3 is recommended for current purchases. Fulda: lower comparative rankings indicate compromises versus the Semperit in the test criteria that drive higher placements (usually braking and cornering grip). If maximum grip and shortest braking in independent tests are your priority, Fulda trails the Semperit.

Verdict
Based on the available ADAC and AutoBild test positions, the Semperit Speed‑Life 2 demonstrates better test performance overall than the Fulda EcoControl HP. The Semperit is the stronger performer in test conditions that emphasise handling and braking, while the Fulda remains a sensible, economy‑oriented tyre with decent showings but lower rankings. For up‑to‑date buying decisions, look to the successor models — Speed‑Life 3 and EcoControl HP2 — and consult full test reports for detailed metrics (wet braking, rolling resistance, noise) that match your priorities.