18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Sava Perfecta vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Sava
Perfecta
Continental
UltraContact NXT
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
2
14
3
Best position
#14
#1
#8
#2
Average position
14.0
1.0
13.4
3.3
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
46
23
153
40

Wet

Wet
Sava Perfecta
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet circle cornering
Sava Perfecta
39%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Perfecta
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Wet handling
Sava Perfecta
26%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Perfecta
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet braking
Sava Perfecta
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%

Costs

Costs
Sava Perfecta
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Sava Perfecta
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Comfort

Comfort
Sava Perfecta
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Sava Perfecta
41%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dry

Dry
Sava Perfecta
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison