18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Sava Perfecta vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Sava
Perfecta
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
1
14
15
Best position
#14
#8
#2
Average position
14.0
13.4
9.0
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
Available sizes
46
153
225

Wet

Wet
Sava Perfecta
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet braking
Sava Perfecta
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Sava Perfecta
39%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Perfecta
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet handling
Sava Perfecta
26%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Perfecta
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%

Costs

Costs
Sava Perfecta
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Fuel efficiency
Sava Perfecta
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Mileage
Sava Perfecta
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Comfort

Comfort
Sava Perfecta
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Sava Perfecta
41%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Interior noise
Sava Perfecta
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Dry

Dry
Sava Perfecta
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry driving behavior
Sava Perfecta
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison