18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Sava Perfecta vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Sava
Perfecta
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
14
2
3
Best position
#14
#8
#1
#2
Average position
14.0
13.4
1.0
3.3
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
46
153
23
40

Wet

Wet
Sava Perfecta
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet braking
Sava Perfecta
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Sava Perfecta
39%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Perfecta
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Wet handling
Sava Perfecta
26%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Perfecta
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Dry

Dry
Sava Perfecta
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Costs

Costs
Sava Perfecta
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Sava Perfecta
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Comfort

Comfort
Sava Perfecta
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Sava Perfecta
41%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison