18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Test Profile

Sava
Intensa HP2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Number of tests
4
10
3
33
Best position
#12
#2
#2
#1
Average position
18.3
6.0
3.7
4.1
Latest test
2024
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
22
104
34
658

Wet

Wet
Sava Intensa HP2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Wet braking
Sava Intensa HP2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Intensa HP2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Intensa HP2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%

Costs

Costs
Sava Intensa HP2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Mileage
Sava Intensa HP2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Sava Intensa HP2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Exterior noise
Sava Intensa HP2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%

Dry

Dry
Sava Intensa HP2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Dry braking
Sava Intensa HP2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison