18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Sava
Intensa HP2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
4
3
3
2
3
Best position
#12
#2
#2
#1
#2
Average position
18.3
3.7
3.3
1.0
3.3
Latest test
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
22
34
40
23
40

Wet

Wet
Sava Intensa HP2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Intensa HP2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet braking
Sava Intensa HP2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Intensa HP2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%

Dry

Dry
Sava Intensa HP2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Sava Intensa HP2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%

Costs

Costs
Sava Intensa HP2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Sava Intensa HP2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Comfort

Comfort
Sava Intensa HP2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Sava Intensa HP2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison