18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Sava
Intensa HP
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
4
2
3
Best position
#8
#3
#1
#2
Average position
13.5
12.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
59
111
23
34

Wet

Wet
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Sava Intensa HP
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Sava Intensa HP
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Sava Intensa HP
57%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Sava Intensa HP
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Sava Intensa HP
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Costs

Costs
Sava Intensa HP
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison