18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Sava Intensa HPBudget
SavaSava

Intensa HP

R14 – R16
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Michelin Primacy 4+Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4+

7.6
R16 – R21
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Sava
Intensa HP
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
10
13
3
Best position
#8
#2
#1
#2
Average position
13.5
6.0
4.3
3.7
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
59
104
123
34

Wet

Wet
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet circle cornering
Sava Intensa HP
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Sava Intensa HP
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Sava Intensa HP
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Costs

Costs
Sava Intensa HP
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Sava Intensa HP
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Sava Intensa HP
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Sava Intensa HP
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison