Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Budget

Sava

Intensa HP

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Intensa HP

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Primacy 5

Number of tests

4

10

4

3

Best position

#8

#2

#3

#1

Average position

13.5

6.0

12.0

4.7

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

59

104

111

126

Wet

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Wet braking

Sava Intensa HP

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Wet circle cornering

Sava Intensa HP

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Aquaplaning - cross

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Wet handling

Sava Intensa HP

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Dry

Sava Intensa HP

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Costs

Sava Intensa HP

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Mileage

Sava Intensa HP

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Comfort

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Exterior noise

Sava Intensa HP

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Intensa HP

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Primacy 5

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison