Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Budget

Sava

Intensa HP

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Intensa HP

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

Number of tests

4

10

3

4

Best position

#8

#2

#1

Average position

13.5

6.0

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

59

104

34

—

Wet

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Wet braking

Sava Intensa HP

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

97%

Wet circle cornering

Sava Intensa HP

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Wet handling

Sava Intensa HP

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Costs

Sava Intensa HP

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Mileage

Sava Intensa HP

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Exterior noise

Sava Intensa HP

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Sava Intensa HP

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Intensa HP

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison