18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Sava Intensa HPBudget
SavaSava

Intensa HP

R14 – R16
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Also compare with
Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5 Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Sava
Intensa HP
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
4
10
26
Best position
#8
#2
#1
Average position
13.5
6.0
2.2
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
Available sizes
59
104
66

Wet

Wet
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet circle cornering
Sava Intensa HP
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Wet handling
Sava Intensa HP
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
Sava Intensa HP
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%

Costs

Costs
Sava Intensa HP
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
Sava Intensa HP
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Sava Intensa HP
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Interior noise
Sava Intensa HP
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Dry

Dry
Sava Intensa HP
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison