18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Sava Intensa HPBudget
SavaSava

Intensa HP

R14 – R16
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
BFGoodrich AdvantageUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Also compare with
Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Sava
Intensa HP
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
4
10
14
Best position
#8
#2
#8
Average position
13.5
6.0
13.4
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
Available sizes
59
104
153

Wet

Wet
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet circle cornering
Sava Intensa HP
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Wet handling
Sava Intensa HP
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet braking
Sava Intensa HP
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%

Costs

Costs
Sava Intensa HP
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Mileage
Sava Intensa HP
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Comfort

Comfort
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Sava Intensa HP
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Dry

Dry
Sava Intensa HP
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison