18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Sava
Intensa HP
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
4
3
4
2
Best position
#8
#2
#3
#1
Average position
13.5
3.3
12.0
1.0
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
59
40
111
23

Wet

Wet
Sava Intensa HP
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Wet handling
Sava Intensa HP
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Intensa HP
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet braking
Sava Intensa HP
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Wet circle cornering
Sava Intensa HP
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Intensa HP
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%

Comfort

Comfort
Sava Intensa HP
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Sava Intensa HP
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Dry

Dry
Sava Intensa HP
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Costs

Costs
Sava Intensa HP
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Mileage
Sava Intensa HP
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison