Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Budget

Sava

Intensa HP

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Intensa HP

e.Ziex

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

4

3

1

2

Best position

#8

#2

#1

Average position

13.5

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

59

34

64

23

Wet

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Wet braking

Sava Intensa HP

88%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Aquaplaning - cross

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet handling

Sava Intensa HP

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Dry

Sava Intensa HP

76%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Costs

Sava Intensa HP

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Comfort

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Sava Intensa HP

64%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Intensa HP

e.Ziex

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison