Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Budget

Sava

Intensa HP

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Intensa HP

e.Ziex

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Number of tests

4

3

1

26

Best position

#8

#2

#1

Average position

13.5

3.7

1.0

2.2

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

Available sizes

59

34

64

66

Wet

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Wet braking

Sava Intensa HP

88%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Wet circle cornering

Sava Intensa HP

67%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Wet handling

Sava Intensa HP

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Comfort

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Exterior noise

Sava Intensa HP

64%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Dry

Sava Intensa HP

76%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Costs

Sava Intensa HP

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Mileage

Sava Intensa HP

80%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Intensa HP

e.Ziex

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison