18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Sava
Intensa HP
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
4
3
3
2
Best position
#8
#2
#2
#1
Average position
13.5
3.7
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
59
34
40
23

Wet

Wet
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Wet handling
Sava Intensa HP
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet braking
Sava Intensa HP
88%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Wet circle cornering
Sava Intensa HP
67%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%

Comfort

Comfort
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Sava Intensa HP
64%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Dry

Dry
Sava Intensa HP
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Costs

Costs
Sava Intensa HP
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Mileage
Sava Intensa HP
80%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison