Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Budget

Sava

Intensa HP

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Continental

UltraContact NXT

Advantage

6.8

R14 – R20

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Intensa HP

UltraContact NXT

Advantage

Number of tests

4

2

14

Best position

#8

#1

#8

Average position

13.5

1.0

13.4

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

Available sizes

59

23

153

Wet

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Aquaplaning - cross

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Wet handling

Sava Intensa HP

57%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Wet braking

Sava Intensa HP

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Wet circle cornering

Sava Intensa HP

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Comfort

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Exterior noise

Sava Intensa HP

64%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Dry

Sava Intensa HP

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Costs

Sava Intensa HP

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Mileage

Sava Intensa HP

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Intensa HP

UltraContact NXT

Advantage

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison