Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Budget

Sava

Intensa HP

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Continental

PremiumContact 6

Ecsta HS52

7.4

R14 – R20

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Intensa HP

PremiumContact 6

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

4

36

10

Best position

#8

#1

#2

Average position

13.5

3.1

6.0

Latest test

2018

2023

2026

Available sizes

59

296

104

Wet

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Continental PremiumContact 6

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Wet circle cornering

Sava Intensa HP

67%

Continental PremiumContact 6

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Continental PremiumContact 6

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Wet handling

Sava Intensa HP

57%

Continental PremiumContact 6

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Continental PremiumContact 6

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Wet braking

Sava Intensa HP

88%

Continental PremiumContact 6

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Costs

Sava Intensa HP

81%

Continental PremiumContact 6

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Fuel efficiency

Sava Intensa HP

82%

Continental PremiumContact 6

83%

Mileage

Sava Intensa HP

80%

Continental PremiumContact 6

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Comfort

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Continental PremiumContact 6

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Exterior noise

Sava Intensa HP

64%

Continental PremiumContact 6

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Interior noise

Sava Intensa HP

77%

Continental PremiumContact 6

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Dry

Sava Intensa HP

76%

Continental PremiumContact 6

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Dry driving behavior

Sava Intensa HP

74%

Continental PremiumContact 6

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Intensa HP

PremiumContact 6

Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison