18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nokian WetProof

Test Profile

Sava
Intensa HP
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nokian
WetProof
Number of tests
4
14
14
Best position
#8
#8
#1
Average position
13.5
13.4
5.6
Latest test
2018
2026
2023
Available sizes
59
153
47

Wet

Wet
Sava Intensa HP
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nokian WetProof
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Intensa HP
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Wet handling
Sava Intensa HP
57%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Intensa HP
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Wet braking
Sava Intensa HP
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Nokian WetProof
85%
Wet circle cornering
Sava Intensa HP
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Nokian WetProof
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Sava Intensa HP
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Exterior noise
Sava Intensa HP
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Interior noise
Sava Intensa HP
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Nokian WetProof
69%

Dry

Dry
Sava Intensa HP
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Dry driving behavior
Sava Intensa HP
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Nokian WetProof
71%

Costs

Costs
Sava Intensa HP
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Nokian WetProof
60%
Mileage
Sava Intensa HP
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Nokian WetProof
56%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison