Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Hankook ION Evo

Budget

Sava

Intensa HP

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Intensa HP

Advantage

Primacy 4+

ION Evo

Number of tests

4

14

13

1

Best position

#8

#1

Average position

13.5

13.4

4.3

1.0

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

Available sizes

59

153

123

64

Wet

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet braking

Sava Intensa HP

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet circle cornering

Sava Intensa HP

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Michelin Primacy 4+

72%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet handling

Sava Intensa HP

57%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Comfort

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Sava Intensa HP

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin Primacy 4+

77%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dry

Sava Intensa HP

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Costs

Sava Intensa HP

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Mileage

Sava Intensa HP

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Michelin Primacy 4+

91%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Hankook ION Evo

Intensa HP

Advantage

Primacy 4+

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison