Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Budget

Sava

Intensa HP

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Intensa HP

Advantage

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

4

14

4

3

2

Best position

#8

#3

#2

#1

Average position

13.5

13.4

12.0

3.3

1.0

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

59

153

111

40

23

Wet

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Wet braking

Sava Intensa HP

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet circle cornering

Sava Intensa HP

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Aquaplaning - cross

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet handling

Sava Intensa HP

57%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Costs

Sava Intensa HP

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

Sava Intensa HP

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Comfort

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Sava Intensa HP

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Dry

Sava Intensa HP

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Intensa HP

Advantage

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison