18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Sava Intensa HP

Sava

Intensa HP

VS

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Sava

Intensa HP

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

4

14

15

Best position

#8

#8

#2

Average position

13.5

13.4

9.0

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

Available sizes

59

153

225

Wet

Wet

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet braking

Sava Intensa HP

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet circle cornering

Sava Intensa HP

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Aquaplaning - cross

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Wet handling

Sava Intensa HP

57%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Dry

Dry

Sava Intensa HP

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry driving behavior

Sava Intensa HP

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Costs

Costs

Sava Intensa HP

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Fuel efficiency

Sava Intensa HP

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

83%

Mileage

Sava Intensa HP

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Comfort

Comfort

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

Sava Intensa HP

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Interior noise

Sava Intensa HP

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison