18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Sava Intensa HPBudget
SavaSava

Intensa HP

R14 – R16
BFGoodrich AdvantageUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Also compare with
Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Sava
Intensa HP
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
4
14
10
Best position
#8
#8
#2
Average position
13.5
13.4
6.0
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
Available sizes
59
153
104

Wet

Wet
Sava Intensa HP
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
Sava Intensa HP
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet circle cornering
Sava Intensa HP
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Intensa HP
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet handling
Sava Intensa HP
57%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Intensa HP
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Costs

Costs
Sava Intensa HP
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Sava Intensa HP
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Sava Intensa HP
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Sava Intensa HP
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dry

Dry
Sava Intensa HP
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison