Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Budget

Sava

Intensa HP

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Intensa HP

Advantage

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

4

14

3

Best position

#8

#2

Average position

13.5

13.4

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

59

153

34

60

Wet

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet braking

Sava Intensa HP

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Wet circle cornering

Sava Intensa HP

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Aquaplaning - cross

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Wet handling

Sava Intensa HP

57%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Dry

Sava Intensa HP

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Costs

Sava Intensa HP

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Mileage

Sava Intensa HP

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Comfort

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

Sava Intensa HP

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Intensa HP

Advantage

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison