Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Budget

Sava

Intensa HP

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

UltraContact NXT

9.5

R16 – R20

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Intensa HP

Advantage

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

4

14

2

Best position

#8

#1

Average position

13.5

13.4

1.0

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

Available sizes

59

153

23

Wet

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Wet braking

Sava Intensa HP

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet circle cornering

Sava Intensa HP

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Aquaplaning - cross

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet handling

Sava Intensa HP

57%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Costs

Sava Intensa HP

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

Sava Intensa HP

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Comfort

Sava Intensa HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Sava Intensa HP

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Dry

Sava Intensa HP

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Intensa HP

Advantage

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison