18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Test Profile

Sava
Intensa HP
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Number of tests
4
14
36
Best position
#8
#8
#1
Average position
13.5
13.4
3.1
Latest test
2018
2026
2023
Available sizes
59
153
296

Wet

Wet
Sava Intensa HP
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Wet circle cornering
Sava Intensa HP
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Intensa HP
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Wet handling
Sava Intensa HP
57%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Intensa HP
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Wet braking
Sava Intensa HP
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%

Costs

Costs
Sava Intensa HP
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Mileage
Sava Intensa HP
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Fuel efficiency
Sava Intensa HP
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%

Comfort

Comfort
Sava Intensa HP
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Exterior noise
Sava Intensa HP
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Interior noise
Sava Intensa HP
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%

Dry

Dry
Sava Intensa HP
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Dry driving behavior
Sava Intensa HP
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison