18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Sava
Eskimo HP2
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Number of tests
15
19
23
17
Best position
#6
#3
#1
#1
Average position
15.5
11.2
3.3
1.7
Latest test
2025
2021
2025
2025
Available sizes
28
76
176
80

Snow

Snow
Sava Eskimo HP2
78%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow traction
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Snow braking
Sava Eskimo HP2
86%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow handling
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow performance
Sava Eskimo HP2
77%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Snow cornering
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Dry

Dry
Sava Eskimo HP2
71%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Dry braking
Sava Eskimo HP2
70%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Dry driving behavior
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Dry handling
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%

Wet

Wet
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Wet braking
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Eskimo HP2
69%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Wet handling
Sava Eskimo HP2
60%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Wet circle cornering
Sava Eskimo HP2
59%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Costs

Costs
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Mileage
Sava Eskimo HP2
76%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Fuel efficiency
Sava Eskimo HP2
89%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Rolling resistance
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Price/value
Sava Eskimo HP2
92%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%

Comfort

Comfort
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Exterior noise
Sava Eskimo HP2
62%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Comfort
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Interior noise
Sava Eskimo HP2
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%

Ice

Ice
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Ice braking
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Ice lateral guidance
Sava Eskimo HP2
87%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison