Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Budget

Sava

Eskimo HP2

VS

WR Snowproof

Blizzak LM-005

8.2

R14 – R22

3 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Eskimo HP2

WR Snowproof

Blizzak LM-005

Number of tests

15

14

49

Best position

#6

#5

#1

Average position

15.5

11.1

3.2

Latest test

2025

2023

2024

Available sizes

28

60

213

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance

62%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

61%

Nokian

WR Snowproof

90%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Wet Braking

Sava Eskimo HP2

66%

Nokian WR Snowproof

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

96%

Wet Handling

Sava Eskimo HP2

60%

Nokian WR Snowproof

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

Wet Circle Cornering

Sava Eskimo HP2

59%

Nokian WR Snowproof

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

92%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Sava Eskimo HP2

57%

Nokian WR Snowproof

57%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Aquaplaning Cross

Sava Eskimo HP2

67%

Nokian WR Snowproof

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Dry Performance

70%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

84%

Nokian

WR Snowproof

86%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Dry Braking

Sava Eskimo HP2

68%

Nokian WR Snowproof

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

Dry Handling

Sava Eskimo HP2

72%

Nokian WR Snowproof

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

92%

Snow Performance

78%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

71%

Nokian

WR Snowproof

82%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Snow Braking

Sava Eskimo HP2

89%

Nokian WR Snowproof

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

Snow Traction

Sava Eskimo HP2

81%

Nokian WR Snowproof

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Snow Handling

Sava Eskimo HP2

69%

Nokian WR Snowproof

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

74%

Snow Circle Cornering

Sava Eskimo HP2

74%

Nokian WR Snowproof

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Ice Performance

87%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

80%

Nokian

WR Snowproof

80%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Ice Braking Abs

Sava Eskimo HP2

87%

Nokian WR Snowproof

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

Comfort & Noise

76%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

81%

Nokian

WR Snowproof

82%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Noise Exterior

Sava Eskimo HP2

69%

Nokian WR Snowproof

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

Ride Comfort

Sava Eskimo HP2

83%

Nokian WR Snowproof

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

75%

Economy

79%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

85%

Nokian

WR Snowproof

75%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Rolling Resistance

Sava Eskimo HP2

83%

Nokian WR Snowproof

94%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Mileage

Sava Eskimo HP2

74%

Nokian WR Snowproof

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

67%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
ADAC	Winter	2022	215/60 R16	View
Autobild	Winter	2021	205/55 R16	View
Autobild	Winter	2019	225/45 R17	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Eskimo HP2

WR Snowproof

Blizzak LM-005

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison