18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive

Riken Road Performance
RikenRiken

Road Performance

R15 – R16
Kumho HA32 Solus 4SUpper-middle
KumhoKumho

HA32 Solus 4S

4.9
R13 – R20
Budget
GTGT

RADIAL ClimateActive

8.3
R16
Also compare with
Cinturato All Season SF3 Quatrac CrossClimate 2

Test Profile

Riken
Road Performance
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Number of tests
—
9
3
Best position
—
#5
#5
Average position
—
10.8
7.3
Latest test
—
2023
2025
Available sizes
—
73
1

Wet

Wet
Riken Road Performance
70%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Wet braking
Riken Road Performance
63%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
61%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Aquaplaning - cross
Riken Road Performance
76%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
62%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%

Dry

Dry
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Dry braking
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
63%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%

Costs

Costs
Riken Road Performance
67%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
65%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Mileage
Riken Road Performance
67%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%

Comfort

Comfort
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Exterior noise
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
80%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison