18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Riken Road Performance
RikenRiken

Road Performance

R15 – R16
Kumho Ecsta PS71Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta PS71

8.3
R16 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Riken
Road Performance
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
—
15
3
1
Best position
—
#2
#2
#1
Average position
—
9.0
3.7
1.0
Latest test
—
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
—
225
34
64

Wet

Wet
Riken Road Performance
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Riken Road Performance
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Riken Road Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Dry

Dry
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Costs

Costs
Riken Road Performance
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Riken Road Performance
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison